And shouldn't you be managing your own BATFE and getting to the bottom of project Fast and Furious instead of running HBO and pitching new episodes (or perhaps a movie) of The Wire?
This man heads the justice department but is kind enough to consider himself the latest CEO of a cable subscription channel? If Mr. Holder wants The Wire back on the air, perhaps he could start writing the script and casting the acting slots. Certainly he has enough time to multi-task between Fast & Furious gate or Black Panther gate to write the scripts, no? If that's not the case, shouldn't he be helping states rid themselves of the illegal immigration problems they have?
If it is not apparent to you now, it probably never will be, but it is quite obvious that the current executive branch administration is only in this for two things: 1) Personal gain, both financially and political power wise, 2) To absolutely destroy anything with any shred of our founding as to remake us into their ideals.
Now, Mr. Holder, would you please leave the Justice Department and start directing that new The Wire movie? I'm sure the BATFE would thank you for getting the heat off of them that way they can go back to more Waco's and Ruby Ridge's like their sister organization instead of the current international incidents.
Showing posts with label BATFE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BATFE. Show all posts
02 June 2011
Mr. Holder, Shouldn't You be Running the Justice Department?
Labels:
BATFE,
Corruption,
Eric Holder,
Gov Fail,
Gov Overlords
28 May 2011
BATFE Multi-Rifle Reporting Comment Period
Comment period for the BATFE's multiple rifle sale reporting requirement ends on Tuesday May 31st. If you have not done so (or even if you have), click here to oppose this illegal executive action.
If the BATFE can't track guns THEY let slip into Mexico, why should we trust them with information regarding our citizens?
If the BATFE can't track guns THEY let slip into Mexico, why should we trust them with information regarding our citizens?
27 January 2011
09 September 2010
UPDATE 3: FLASH! Senate Judiciary Hearing on "Firearms in Commerce?"
I did finally hear back from my junior Senator's office last night and got positive confirmation that the hearing next Tuesday is going to be regarding the BATFE reform bill. Unfortunately, details are still extremely sketchy. There is not a list of persons scheduled to give testimony and Senator Cardin does not yet have a position on this bill (somewhat understandable, be he has an anti-track record). The staffer I spoke to did say that they had received a high call volume pertaining to the hearing and that I could check the judiciary website for updates.
I don't know about the rest of the freedom loving world, but my spidey sense is still tingling.
I don't know about the rest of the freedom loving world, but my spidey sense is still tingling.
08 September 2010
UPDATE 2: FLASH! Senate Judiciary Hearing on "Firearms in Commerce?"
NRA Confirmation! I still don't understand the motives behind Chairman Leahy for bringing this hearing to the forefront during an election year while Dems are about to get slaughtered. It seems dumbfounding to me. However, get on those horns and talk it up with your Senators and Congressman. Make it an issue for them to have to deal with.
Labels:
BATFE,
Crazy Anti's,
FLASH Traffic,
Second Amendment
UPDATE: FLASH! Senate Judiciary Hearing on "Firearms in Commerce?"
Despite not having a phone call returned from Senator Cardin's office (he's my junior Senator and a member of the judiciary committee), I have gotten loose confirmation that the hearing scheduled for next week is to debate S 941. This bill is known as the “Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Reform and Firearms Modernization Act of 2009" and is co-sponsored by Chairman Leahy. Go figure.
The question is, why now? This bill clearly will not do anything to help stem the losses of the 'rats' seats, and certainly, if it is passed won't energize their base. Perhaps it is a poison pill to claim some "moderation" on an issue that is cross-sectional and appealing to mainstream voters? A last horrah of sorts in order to be considered American and electable entering November? It's anybody's guess, but let's not get carried away here, it is still Washington and the committee is controlled by the leftists in power.
More updates when I can dig them up.
The question is, why now? This bill clearly will not do anything to help stem the losses of the 'rats' seats, and certainly, if it is passed won't energize their base. Perhaps it is a poison pill to claim some "moderation" on an issue that is cross-sectional and appealing to mainstream voters? A last horrah of sorts in order to be considered American and electable entering November? It's anybody's guess, but let's not get carried away here, it is still Washington and the committee is controlled by the leftists in power.
More updates when I can dig them up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)